The Bellview Airlines' crash led to the death of 117 people who were on board the aircraft.
But in reaction, the former minister, who served under the Olusegun
Obasanjo administration and has since the Associated Airlines crash two
weeks ago been engaged in a duel with the current Minister of Aviation,
Stella Oduah, dismissed the allegation, calling Ozoka a “pathological
liar” with an axe to grind following his removal.
Ozoka, who spoke exclusively to THISDAY in an interview, said: “At a
time everybody knew they were singing a song that it was a bomb that
blew down the Bellview aircraft.
“So when somebody was appointed aviation minister (Fani-Kayode) in
2006. He said to me, call a press briefing and announce that it was a
bomb that blew down the airplane. We were still investigating the crash
then and he said that right in his office with his permanent secretary,
his aides and other staff.
“It was not a one-on-one directive, everybody was there. And I said I
would not do it. I said: ‘Hon. Minister I will not do it. It was not a
bomb I will not do it’. Then he said: ‘I hope you know I can remove
you.’ I said: ‘You are the Honourable Minister’.”
Elaborating, Ozoka added: “When I was in AIB investigating that fatal
crash on October 22, 2005 that killed 117 people, I was forced to hand
over to somebody who was the Director of Air Worthiness at NCAA when the
crash happened. He was advised not to allow the plane to fly and he
defied the advice.
“When the crash happened, he was removed. Only for somebody that called
himself a Minister of the Federal Republic of Nigeria to bring that
same person and appointed him to head the investigation into that crash
as Commissioner of AIB.”
Ozoka admitted he was angry at the level of hypocrisy in the country
and the criticism concerning the recent Associated Airlines' crash,
noting that many of those who are talking now, were aware of why he was
removed and replaced by somebody who indirectly had a hand in the crash
to investigate the accident. "and none of these people that are talking now saw anything wrong with that appointment; none of them said anything against that. If they said anything, let them produce what they said so i dont take their criticism seriously.
To me, that is the height of hypocrisy. The people who are enticing now knew what happened. They were in the system; none condemned that action. I don't take the seriously and that is why I said a lot of people go to the television to make noise.
To me, that is the height of hypocrisy. The people who are enticing now knew what happened. They were in the system; none condemned that action. I don't take the seriously and that is why I said a lot of people go to the television to make noise.
“Aviation is not where you go and make noise. A plane has crashed; we are supposed to be in mourning," he said.
Ozoka also dismissed the notion that there might have been two reports
on the Bellview crash, noting that his work might have been abandoned
because it did not tally with what his successor wanted, but it was his
report that was concluded by the present Commissioner and Chief
Executive of AIB, Muktar Usman.
“I submitted a preliminary report, submitted an interim report, and
submitted an updated report. We had not got to the conclusion and safety
recommendations before I was removed. I spent over two years there.
“When the person that took over from me came in, it is possible that
the report that I submitted wouldn’t be in tandem with what he wanted,
so it was delayed until luckily, God in His own way made it that the
person was removed.
“Then Captain Usman was appointed and completed the report, following the footsteps of what I had laid down," he said.
Ozoka said when he was removed, he wrote and informed all the security
agencies, disclosing: “I told them that the aviation ministry wanted to
manipulate the investigation."
According to him, “I copied the Inspector General of Police, State
Security Service (SSS), National Security Adviser, Senate Committee on
Aviation, Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Head of Service
and Civil Service Commission and said they wanted to manipulate the
investigation.
“It was only the Secretary to the Government of the Federation at the
time that wrote a letter to the Ministry of Aviation asking why were
they doing this? Nobody else said anything.”
Ozoka explained that the establishment of AIB required National
Assembly legislation for the establishment Act, which took at least one
year and a public hearing before it was signed into law, stating that it
was not Fani-Kayode that established AIB.
“AIB was established by an Act of parliament and to pass a law takes
one to two years, so the former minister cannot say that he was the one
who established AIB, although it was signed into law by the then
president (Obasanjo) on November 14, while the minister was appointed on
November 7, 2006, so how did he establish AIB?” he asked.
But a personal aide to Fani-Kayode, Taiwo Lawal, yesterday denied the
allegation, saying Ozoka was a liar and had falsified the reports of the
accidents that had occurred at the time because he was a corrupt man.
“How the former minister could have asked him to include something in a
report that was submitted a year before we came into office beats my
imagination.
“His report was formally submitted to Chief Fani-Kayode’s predecessor
in office before he became Minister of Aviation so the suggestion that
he or anyone else asked Ozoka to doctor his report and say that there
was a bomb or anything else on board is ludicrous.
“How can you doctor or change something that had already been submitted
and released? The reason that Ozoka was sacked was because Chief
Fani-Kayode discovered that he was incompetent and all his reports about
air crashes had question marks.
“The former minister suspected him of doctoring accident reports and he
told him that to his face and promptly sacked him,” Lawal said.
Lawal maintained that Ozoka was lying and alleged that all the accident investigation reports he submitted were unreliable.
“It was not only the Bellview crash report that he submitted that was
suspicious and unreliable but all the reports he submitted, of all the
five crashes that took place between 2005 and 2006 that resulted in the
death of 453 people.
“Consequently, he had to go because the former minister felt the
federal government could not protect the lives of air travellers as long
as such a questionable and shady character was in the aviation sector.
“The final report of the investigation on the Bellview crash which
commenced after Chief Fani-Kayode left office and which was conducted by
the new AIB, a new agency which the former minister set up after
Ozoka's exit, vindicated his position about Ozoka's earlier report
because it contradicted all his findings,” Lawal added.
Lawal noted that the final report of the Bellview crash was not submitted until 2010, a good three years after Fani-Kayode left office.
“If you have any doubts about the fact that it contradicted Ozoka's
earlier report substantially, ask Engineer (Sam) Oduselu (Ozoka’s
successor), who was the person that was in charge of AIB when the
investigation was conducted and who submitted that report to both the
present minister and the one that came before her, for a copy.
“The report was meant to be passed on to the president but it never
was. Dr. (Harold) Demuren, who was in charge of NCAA (Nigeria Civil
Aviation Authority) at the time and the American NTSB investigation
agency were also given copies of Oduselu's report in 2010.
“Chief Fani-Kayode did the right and proper thing by sacking that man
Ozoka because he was a disaster and a danger to the Nigerian
air-traveller,” Lawal said.
The former minister’s aide said even former President Obasanjo felt the same way about Ozoka which is why he approved his sack and gave Fani-Kayode permission to set up a “new and more or less independent agency.”
The new AIB, he said, was autonomous of the ministry and an entirely
new parastatal set up specially to investigate aircrashes and to report
directly to the president in the event of a crash.
About a year after the Bellview crash, a kite was flown by some
government officials in the aviation sector who had alleged that a bomb
was planted on board the ill-fated aircraft.
Those in the know said the story was propagated in order to absolve the
airline of liability and manipulate the insurance claim on the
aircraft.
But the bomb conspiracy theory was in stark contrast to the
investigative report made available by the US Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) and AIB, which attributed the crash to a technical
problem with the aircraft and pilot error.
AIB’s investigation report had said: “The investigation considered
several factors that could explain the accident. They include the PIC
(Pilot in Command) training of the captain before taking command of the
B737 aircraft, which was inadequate. The cumulative flight hours of the
pilot in the days before the accident which was indicative of excessive
workload that could lead to fatigue.”
Furthermore, the AIB investigative report revealed that the airplane
had technical defects and should not have been dispatched for either the
accident flight or earlier flights.