A government minister used to be present at royal births, to make sure the baby was not switched
The practice is believed
to have begun in 1688, when dozens of officials watched Mary of Modena,
wife of James II, give birth to a son, to scotch rumors that Mary was
not really pregnant and that the baby was to be smuggled into the room
in a bedpan.
The tradition continued
well into the 20th century. The last royal birth to be witnessed by a
government minister was that of Queen Elizabeth II's cousin, Princess
Alexandra in 1936, and the practice was only officially halted shortly
before the birth of Prince Charles in 1948.
Royal husbands have not always attended the birth of their children
Queen Elizabeth II
may not have had to contend with ministerial interference in her birth
plan, but she also didn't have her husband there for support; while she
gave birth to Prince Charles, Prince Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh was busy playing squash.
Royal baby watch
Could baby girl modernize monarchy?
Royal birth a boon for souvenir industry
Road to the royal baby's birth
Prince Charles was on
hand when Diana had Prince William, but William himself may not be there
for his own child's birth -- expected any day now -- if he's at work as
a search-and-rescue pilot when the big moment arrives.
If for any reason William
can't get to the hospital on time, the Duchess of Cambridge is reported
to have asked her mother, Carole Middleton, to be there to support her.
Queen Victoria was the first royal to use anesthesia in childbirth
The long-reigning
monarch and mother-of-nine was given chloroform for pain relief during
the births of her eighth and ninth children, Prince Leopold (born in
1853) and Princess Beatrice (born in 1857).
Her decision to opt for
an anesthetic is credited with popularizing the use of painkillers
during childbirth among the well-to-do of the time.
John Snow, the doctor
who administered the drug, is better known as one of the founding
fathers of epidemiology, after he traced a deadly outbreak of cholera to
a Soho water pump.
Prince William was the first heir to the throne to be born in hospital
William was born in the
private Lindo Wing of St Mary's Hospital, Paddington, on June 21, 1982.
His brother was born at the same hospital two years later, and William's
new son or daughter is also expected to come into the world there.
While that might seem
the normal way of things, in fact it was something of a break with
tradition -- until then, all heirs to the throne had been born at home
(or at one of the royal family's homes at least).
Prince Charles was born
at Buckingham Palace; Elizabeth II herself was born in the Mayfair home
of her grandfather in 1926 -- though at the time she was not expected to
become queen as her uncle, and not her father, was next in line to the
throne.
Titled royal babies do not have surnames
Members of the royal family are famously burdened with plenty of names
-- Prince William was christened William Arthur Philip Louis, and his
father is Charles Philip Arthur George -- but many (those titled His or
Her Royal Highness) do not have a surname.
Prince William and
Prince Harry have used "Wales" at school and during their military
careers, but this comes from their father's official title as Prince of
Wales. William and Kate may continue to use this for their new baby.
As descendants of Queen
Elizabeth II and the Duke of Edinburgh, they could also use Windsor, or
Mountbatten-Windsor -- both of which are relatively new inventions,
adopted during World War I to disguise the family's German origins.
Alternatively, the royal parents-to-be could even opt to found their own dynasty, using "Cambridge" as a surname.